English

WBS succeeds against Schulenberg & Schenk | File sharing

WILDE BEUGER SOLMECKE has succeeded in another file sharing case, this time against the German law firm Schulenberg & Schenk.

File sharing: WBS succeeds against Schulenberg & Schenk © Benjamin-Duda-Fotolia

File sharing: WBS succeeds against Schulenberg & Schenk © Benjamin-Duda-Fotolia

File sharing success

WILDE BEUGER SOLMECKE has won another file sharing case, this time against the German law firm Schulenberg & Schenk. The court rejected Schulenberg & Schenk’s file sharing claim in its entirety (case ref. 3b C 145/14).

Warning letter

Our client had received a warning letter from i-catcher media GmbH & Co. KG accusing him of infringing German copyright law by exchanging the film “Break – No Mercy, Just Pain” on a file sharing website.

The company demanded the payment of a licence fee amounting to almost €200 and the reimbursement of legal fees of over €650.

Incorrect investigation software

The lawyers at WILDE BEUGER SOLMECKE argued that the investigation of the file sharing activity had been conducted incorrectly. The court agreed, stating that the software used to log the copyright infringement, called “Observer”, was not reliable enough, as it had not been independently verified before use.

Presumption of guilt rebutted

The court also rejected Schulenberg & Schenk’s claim on the basis that the defendant had succeeded in rebutting the presumption of guilt. Here, the defendant had asserted he was not at home when the copyright infringement was committed and that other members of the household, including his wife and two adult daughters, had had access to the internet connection.

The court’s decision on this aspect is welcomed and follows the case law set by Germany’s Federal Court of Justice (Bearshare judgment from 08.01.2013, IZR 169/12).

No breach of duty of care

There was also no basis for finding that the defendant had breached a duty of care. All members of the household were adults and as none of the family members had previously drawn attention for file sharing, there was no requirement for the internet connection owner to especially monitor the connection.

Here is the full text of the judgment.

Christian Solmecke is a partner at the law firm WILDE BEUGER SOLMECKE. He is the author of numerous legal publications in the area of internet and IT law. He is also an associate lecturer for social media law at the Cologne University of Applied Sciences.

Do you like this article? Feel free to rate it now:

1 Stern2 Sterne3 Sterne4 Sterne5 Sterne (Not rated yet)

Free initial assessment

Use this form to request a free initial assessment. → TIP: If you have received a warning letter or other correspondence, you can attach it directly to your query. This will speed up the assessment.
  • Since we´re calling you for a free initial assessment, we would need to have your phone number.
  • Anything between 09:00 am and 08:00 pm.
  • Please tell us briefly what your query is about. This will make it easier for us to allocate your query to the correct contact person.
  • Drop files here or
    Accepted file types: doc, docx, pdf, txt, rtf, jpg, tiff.
    Please attach your documents through this form field. Allowed file types are .doc, .docx, .pdf, .txt, .rtf, .jpg and .tiff. You can upload a maximum of 5 files. If your document consists of multiple files, please try to merge the files to one file. As an alternative solution you can send your documents via email to info@wbs-law.de.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

RSSComments (0)

Leave a comment | Trackback URL

Leave a comment

By submitting your comment, your consent to our privacy policy is deemed to be given.