WILDE BEUGER SOLMECKE has successfully defended a file sharing case against German law firm Schulenberg & Schenk. The county court in Frankfurt rejected Schulenberg’s claim in its entirety (case ref. 29 C 1513/13).
File sharing claim
WILDE BEUGER SOLMECKE has successfully defended a file sharing case brought by the German law firm Schulenberg & Schenk.
The county court in Frankfurt referred several times to an essay published by WBS criticising the inconsistent case law in relation to the burden of proof in file sharing cases (MMR 2013, 217).
Facts of the case
A creator and producer of pornographic films instructed Schulenberg & Schenk to send a copyright infringement notice to our client claiming compensation. The producer asserted that our client had illegally made a film available for download via a file sharing website.
The court rejected the claim in its entirety for the following reasons:
- Firstly, our client was able to prove that she had taken all reasonable steps to secure the internet connection.
- Secondly, she was able to sufficiently demonstrate that at the time of the alleged copyright infringement, her husband and his two children all had independent access, with their own computers, to the internet connection.
- Thirdly, our client was able to convince the court that she had informed the children about using the internet connection.
The court found that there were no concrete indications to show that the internet connection was being used illegally and as a result there was no need to have expected our client to fulfil a higher burden in relation to monitoring the connection and instructing the family members.
The opposition still has the possibility of raising an appeal.
- If a connection owner can prove that there is a real possibility, that at the time of the alleged copyright infringement, the internet connection was being used by another person, the accused cannot be held liable as a perpetrator.
- Connection owners can only be held liable in nuisance if they fail to fulfil their due diligence obligations. The extent of the due diligence obligations vary depending on whether there are concrete indications that the connection is being used by others to commit legal infringements.
The possibility that the infringement could have been conducted by another person is sufficient. Such a possibility is always present if other family members have independent access to the internet connection.
Connection owners must regularly inform children about how to use the internet connection legally. They are not, however, under a general obligation to monitor their children.
- File sharing: connection owners not liable for adult family members
- Rebutting the presumption of guilt in file sharing cases
- Holiday home owner not liable for guest’s file sharing
- File sharing: connection-owner-friendly case law develops further
- File sharing: internet user escapes liability
- File sharing: do parents have to monitor their children?
- File sharing: parents can breathe a sigh of relief
- Success for WILDE BEUGER SOLMECKE at Federal Supreme Court
- File Sharing – Frequently Asked Questions